Read this blog to learn about writing your journal article in twelve weeks. This blog will provide you with all the knowledge you need about academic writing secrets.
Want to know more about the Workbook Forms or the Belcher Editing Diagnostic Test?
The writing workbook asks you to fill out various boxes and forms throughout the book with information and answers you’ve gathered. If you wish to keep your book free of markings, you can use the “Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks” forms, which have been made available as pdfs so that you can use them over and over again. They are arranged in the order in which they appear in each chapter. In addition, I have included there the Belcher Editing Diagnostic Test for Chapter 11 as well as the instructions for completing it. There is one change to make if you are running the test in Windows 10: in the fifth step on page 325, you must seek “Record Macros” rather than “Create Macros.”
Do you want to use it in your classroom?
Graduate students and faculty members have benefited from the writing workbook’s inclusion in courses and seminars. You may learn more about how to do this by reading “How to Teach a Journal Article Writing Class,” which can be found here. On that page, you will find a form to complete in order to request a syllabus.
Comments from readers on the workbook
I have read several books on academic writing, but this is by far the greatest one I have come across. There are numerous high-quality novels like this one available, but this one stands out as being on another level altogether. Everything from the psychological challenges one can encounter to work organization to how to create an argument is covered in this book on the subject of writing. When it comes time to produce academic documents, articles, conference papers, and books, Ph.D. students, as well as college and university lecturers, will find it useful to have this resource available. Aside from being written in plain language and being humorous, there are several helpful, real-world tips and tricks to be found, as well as the sense of belonging that comes from being a part of a community. I feel that this book will go down in history as a classic and a mainstay in its field and that it will be used in a variety of fields of study. “
The following is an Amazon review from Caroline Dufour of York University:
Your workbook for writing journal articles has changed the way young scholars think about academic publication. This has a big impact on their access to the profession, as well.
Email sent by a reader to the author
Workbook Contents and Description
Writing Your Journal Article in 12 Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing is a book written by Laura Belcher. A new way to help them overcome their fears and write the important papers that will help them be successful in their fields has been found. Each week, readers are introduced to a specific characteristic of effective articles and are challenged to revise their own articles in response. They submit their articles to a journal at the end of the twelve-week period. This important resource is the only one of its kind, as it is the only guide that concentrates particularly on publishing journal articles in the humanities and social sciences.
The Most Important Characteristics
• Has a good record of helping graduate students and faculty members get their work in the news. Since its publication in 2009, this workbook has assisted hundreds of scholars to publish their articles in peer-reviewed journals. It was made after a decade of teaching academic writing in a wide range of fields at UCLA and around the world.
When the author wrote this workbook, he looked at real-world research on faculty productivity and peer review. He also used his own experiences as a journal editor and award-winning author to help him write it.
It follows a manageable step-by-step process: The workbook gives you the instruction, exercises, and structure you need to turn a classroom essay, conference paper, dissertation chapter, master’s thesis, or unfinished draught into a journal article and send it to the right journal.
This workbook focuses solely on the most difficult writing challenges that scholarly writers must face, such as becoming motivated, constructing an argument, and putting together a coherent argument.
Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks can be used individually or in groups, and it is especially well suited for graduate student professional development courses, junior faculty orientation workshops, post-doc groups, and journal article writing courses, among other settings.
Wendy Laura Belcher is a professor of African literature at Princeton University’s Department of Comparative Literature and Center for African American Studies, where she also teaches in the Department of Comparative Literature. Workshops on how to write journal articles have been held in North America, Europe, and Africa by her.
Writing your journal article in twelve weeks
The goals of the workbook, its field-tested nature, its pragmatic emphasis, its radical audience, its revision focus, and its disciplines are all talked about in this book.
Instructions for use in general: Using a printed or electronic version of the document. Bringing work to a close. Following disciplinary tracks and stage progressions is recommended. By yourself, in a writing group, with a writing partner, or with other coauthors, or to teach a class or workshop, you can use the workbook to suit your temperament. Here are a few terms and procedures related to publishing: What exactly is a journal? What is the definition of an article? What are the steps that journal articles must go through to be published? Providing the author with feedback
WEEK 1: Constructing Your Strategy for Your Writing
Recognize and accept your writing emotions. The following are the keys to having a pleasant writing experience: Competent academic writers write, read, make writing a social activity, continue despite rejection, and pursue their interests.
Your responsibilities include developing a strategy for submitting your essay in twelve weeks. Day one consisted of reading the workbook. Day two is dedicated to creating your writing routine. Day three involves choosing a paper for revision. Day four involves rereading your manuscript in order to find potential revision jobs. Getting your writing site, citation software, and file backup system set up; dealing with co-authorship; and reading a journal paper are all on the agenda for Day 5.
WEEK 2: Making a Case for Your Opinion
Myths about publishable journal articles include the concept that they must be thoroughly theoretical, densely packed with ideas, and completely unique. What is published and why is it published? How publishable papers combine evidence and techniques in their writing. What gets rejected, and why? There are absolutely excellent essays, as well as those that lack a strong point of view. Understanding and constructing arguments: what is an argument? How do you know if you have one? How do you construct compelling arguments? How do you produce an argument-driven piece? These are all topics covered in this course.
Your responsibilities include: structuring your article around your argument. Day one consisted of reading the workbook. Day two is spent putting your argument through its paces. Day three involves examining your article for logical coherence. Days 4–5: Revise your work to make it more focused on your main point.
Week 3: Writing Your Article’s Abstract
Abstracts are a useful tool for achieving academic achievement. Successful SciQua and HumInt abstractions are essential components of a good abstract.
Your responsibilities include writing an engaging abstract. Day one consists of talking your way to greater clarity about your content. Day two consists of reading other people’s abstracts and creating your own. Day three involves reading high-quality publications in your subject. Day four involves reading articles that you will use as references in your article. Day 5, receiving feedback on your abstract and amending it if necessary,
WEEK 4: Choosing an Academic Journal
There’s good news concerning journals this time around. The significance of selecting the appropriate journal Academic journals are classified into three categories: non-recommended, debatable, and preferred publishing outlets.
Your responsibilities include locating appropriate scholarly journals. Day one consisted of reading the workbook. Day two was spent looking for journals. Days three and four will be spent assessing academic journals. Reading relevant articles and writing query letters were the order of the day on Day 5.
WEEK 5: Tweaking Your WorkCited Citation
Instructions: Read scholarly works to gain knowledge. Scholarly texts can be classified into the following categories: primary, original, or exhibit sources; scholarly or secondary literature; and derivative or tertiary documentation. Advice for scholars working in institutions with limited resources Tips on how to properly cite your reading, including typical citation errors; setting your “citation values,” avoiding improper borrowing; excellent citation habits; and answers to problems that arise after borrowing. Reading theoretical literature, linked literature, and original, primary, or display literature are all effective strategies for getting reading done quickly. Strategies for creating your related-literature review include determining your entry point, understanding what a related-literature review is, and figuring out how to write it.
Is it more appropriate to do a methodological or theoretical literature review?
Your responsibilities include writing about other people’s research. Day one consisted of reading the workbook. Day two consists of analyzing your current Works Cited page. Day three involves identifying and reading any other works that have been identified. Day four entails determining your point of entry into the relevant literature. On Day 5, you’ll be writing or updating your review of related books.
WEEK 6: Constructing Your Claims for Meaningful Determination.
The difference between arguments and claims of significant importance Claim for significance: categories of claims, examples of claims, formulating claims, and the “So What?” exercise are all covered in this section. Feedback in several forms: what to do (and what not to do) while giving and getting feedback in several forms.
Your responsibilities include claiming significance. Day one consisted of reading the workbook. Day two consisted of exchanging writing and participating in the “So What?” exercise. Day three consists of composing and placing your assertions for historical relevance. Days 4–5: Revise your article based on the feedback you’ve received.
WEEK 7: Analyze Your Supporting Evidence
Instructions: Conduct an investigation of the evidence. Textual evidence, qualitative evidence, quantitative evidence, and experimental evidence are all types of evidence.
Your responsibilities include revising your evidence. Day one consisted of reading the workbook. Day two consists of emphasizing and examining your supporting evidence. Day three is dedicated to evaluating the quality, relevance, and placement of your supporting evidence. On Day 4, you’ll be delving into your interpretation of the evidence. On Day 5, I’m going to collect some more evidence.
Week 8: Presenting Your Evidence
Presentation of evidence in SciQua papers, in HUMINT articles, and in illustrations; gaining permission to use images or text; acquiring image or text permission
Your responsibilities include revising your evidence presentation. Day one consisted of reading the workbook. Days 2–4 will be spent revising your evidence presentation. On Day 5, you will be checking your evidence presentation section by section.
Week 9: Strengthening Your Constructive
Instructive material about the significance of structure The following is the article-structuring principles: macrostructure and microstructure; structural building blocks; rhetorical ordering of structure; structure signals; and the structures of common genres. Journal article macrostructures can be classified into the following categories: SciQua; HUMINT; disciplinary; and synaptic macrostructures. There are various types of pre-and post-draft outlining.
Your responsibilities include revising your framework. Day one consisted of reading the workbook. Day two involved outlining a piece written by someone else. Day three involves creating a post-draft outline for your piece. Rewrite and restructure your article on days 4–5.
WEEK 10: Write Your Article’s Introduction and Conclusion
On the significance of openings, the following instructions are provided: crafting your title, molding your introduction, and choosing your title. Concerning the significance of conclusions.
Your responsibilities include finalizing your introduction and conclusion. Day one consisted of reading through the workbook and refining your title. Day two is dedicated to shaping your introduction. Day three consists of crafting your introduction and deciding on a name. On Day 4, you’ll revise your abstract and the order of the authors. Day five is dedicated to putting together your conclusion.
WEEK 11: Proofreading and Editing Your Sentences
Instructions: The nature of microrevisioning is described. It says to cut down on lists; strengthen verbs; clarify pronouns; reduce prepositions, and get rid of extra words.
Your responsibilities include editing your article. Reading through the material and completing the Belcher Editing Diagnostic Test on Day 1. It will take days 2–5 for you to rewrite your content so that it fits the Belcher Editing Diagnostic Test.
WEEK 12: Submitting Your Article To US!
Instructions: Emphasize the significance of completion. Following journal, submission standards include the following steps: knowing the journal’s style manual; implementing the journal’s documentation, punctuation, and spelling style; collecting journal submission information; and creating a cover letter for the submission. What to do after you’ve sent your message.
Your responsibilities include completing your submission. Day one consisted of identifying what needed to be done. Day two involves formatting your article to match the journal’s style. Days three and four are dedicated to resolving any outstanding difficulties. Day 5, deliver your message, and enjoy yourself!
WEEK X: Revise and resubmit your article to the journal.
Instructions and responsibilities: Getting through the review procedure. Receive the journal’s decision: keep note of how long it took the journal to make a choice; manage your emotions while reading and understanding the journal’s decision. Responding to the journal’s decision includes responding to a journal’s decision to reject your paper or to a revise-and-resubmit notice, preparing your article for revision, rewriting your manuscript, composing your revision cover letter, and resubmitting your article to the journal. Following the publication of your work in the journal, you should consider doing two things: drawing attention to your article and reviewing someone else’s article.
Writing Your Article from Scratch in Week 0 is the first step.
Working through the steps of writing your article from scratch without an idea includes the following: setting up, generating ideas, testing your ideas, assembling evidence to support your ideas, composing your article, and rewriting your article with the help of the workbook. Starting with an idea, write your essay from the ground up.
Visit WritingLib for more informational blogs.
And if you need the best high-quality academic writing services then click here
